[RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-15 07:47:35
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-15 07:47:35
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:30:50PM -0700, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
Hi, I have one or two problems with cpufreq and the CCF, which are caused by rounding/different frequency resolutions. cpufreq works with kHz, while the CCF uses Hz. On Zynq our default frequency is 666666666 Hz which the CCF, due to rounding, reports as 666666660. And for
Why does this happen? Isn't that a bug? What is the actual freqency? 666666666 Hz or 2000000000/3 Hz?
cpufreq, which simply divides values it obtains through clk_round_rate() by 1000, 666666. Since passing 666666 to clk_round_rate() does not result in 666666660 (clk_round_rate() always rounds down!), we chose to put 666667 in the OPP. This
What is OPP? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |