On Friday 07 March 2014 17:47:41 Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

quoted

That would have saved only 2 lines since we need the workaround anyhow
(MTU2) and would break the incremental approach of this series somewhat.
I'd like to keep it.

It would have saved one patch. If Simon needs to apply CCF support
separately I'm fine with that approach, but if both changes are applied
at the same time the SCIF patches could go in first.

Which one would be saved? We need to workaround anyhow (patch 5) and
some scif cleanup besides the workaround is needed, too (patch 7). No?

Indeed, I got it wrong. We can leave it as-is then.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140307/78845570/attachment-0001.sig>