On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:58 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

Added support for pcie controller in dra7xx. This driver re-uses
the designware core code that is already present in kernel.

Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <redacted>

Hi Kishon,
Long time no see! I added trivial comments.

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti-pci.txt |   35 ++
 drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                         |   10 +
 drivers/pci/host/Makefile                        |    1 +
 drivers/pci/host/pcie-dra7xx.c                   |  411 ++++++++++++++++++++++

How about using 'pci-' prefix?
As it was discussed earlier, 'pci-' prefix is more proper.

 4 files changed, 457 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti-pci.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-dra7xx.c

[.....]

[.....]

+#define	PCIECTRL_TI_CONF_IRQSTATUS_MAIN		0x0024
+#define	PCIECTRL_TI_CONF_IRQENABLE_SET_MAIN	0x0028

I don't think that it's good to add vendor names such as TI
to SFR names.

How about adding 'DRA7XX' or just removing 'TI'?

1. PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_IRQSTATUS_MAIN

2. PCIECTRL_CONF_IRQSTATUS_MAIN

[.....]

+enum dra7xx_pcie_device_type {
+	DRA7XX_PCIE_UNKNOWN_TYPE,
+	DRA7XX_PCIE_EP_TYPE,
+	DRA7XX_PCIE_LEG_EP_TYPE,
+	DRA7XX_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
+};

This driver can support only RC mode, so, these enum can be removed.

[.....]

+	of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,device-type", &device_type);
+	switch (device_type) {
+	case DRA7XX_PCIE_RC_TYPE:
+		dra7xx_pcie_writel(dra7xx->base,
+			PCIECTRL_TI_CONF_DEVICE_TYPE, DEVICE_TYPE_RC);
+		break;
+	case DRA7XX_PCIE_EP_TYPE:
+		dra7xx_pcie_writel(dra7xx->base,
+			PCIECTRL_TI_CONF_DEVICE_TYPE, DEVICE_TYPE_EP);
+		break;
+	case DRA7XX_PCIE_LEG_EP_TYPE:
+		dra7xx_pcie_writel(dra7xx->base,
+			PCIECTRL_TI_CONF_DEVICE_TYPE, DEVICE_TYPE_LEG_EP);
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_dbg(dev, "UNKNOWN device type %d\n", device_type);
+	}

Thus, this switch can be removed.
Others look good.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han