[PATCH V2] arm64: add DSB after icache flush in __flush_icache_all()
From: Vinayak Kale <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-05 09:36:34
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Nico, Russell, Thanks for the replies. On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:48:50AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:16:48AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:42:29PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:quoted
I don't think they would be reordered at all with the volatile qualifiers.Whilst that may be the case in current compilers (i.e. I've not actually seen the above sequence get re-ordered), the GCC documentation states that: Similarly, you can't expect a sequence of volatile asm instructions to remain perfectly consecutive. If you want consecutive output, use a single asm. Also, GCC performs some optimizations across a volatile asm instruction; GCC does not `forget everything' when it encounters a volatile asm instruction the way some other compilers do. so I really think that the "memory" clobbers are needed to ensure strict ordering. This matches my understanding from discussions with the compiler engineers at ARM.What it means is that the compiler may introduce additional instructions between your consecutive asm() statements. So there's no guarantee that the ISB will immediately follow the MSR instruction - there may be other instructions which the compiler may decide to schedule between the two. For example, instructions to load the address of the variable(s) may be inserted between the assembly specified in the asm() statements which may involve loading from a literal pool.That matches what Nicolas said and, to be honest, makes a lot of sense. I'm just slightly concerned that it doesn't match the explanation I received from some compiler guys, but I can chase that down separately. Vinayak: sorry for leading you down the garden path on this. Please can you stick with your original patch, but adding something equivalent for arch/arm?
I have posted a patch for arch/arm, have tested it for ARM-v7.
Cheers, Will