Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 4 authors, 2014-02-05
DORMANTno replies

[PATCH V2] arm64: add DSB after icache flush in __flush_icache_all()

From: Vinayak Kale <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-05 09:36:34

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Nico, Russell,

Thanks for the replies.

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:48:50AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:16:48AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:42:29PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
I don't think they would be reordered at all with the
volatile qualifiers.
Whilst that may be the case in current compilers (i.e. I've not actually
seen the above sequence get re-ordered), the GCC documentation states that:

  Similarly, you can't expect a sequence of volatile asm instructions to remain
  perfectly consecutive. If you want consecutive output, use a single asm. Also,
  GCC performs some optimizations across a volatile asm instruction; GCC does not
  `forget everything' when it encounters a volatile asm instruction the way some
  other compilers do.

so I really think that the "memory" clobbers are needed to ensure strict
ordering. This matches my understanding from discussions with the compiler
engineers at ARM.
What it means is that the compiler may introduce additional instructions
between your consecutive asm() statements.  So there's no guarantee that
the ISB will immediately follow the MSR instruction - there may be other
instructions which the compiler may decide to schedule between the two.

For example, instructions to load the address of the variable(s) may be
inserted between the assembly specified in the asm() statements which
may involve loading from a literal pool.
That matches what Nicolas said and, to be honest, makes a lot of sense. I'm
just slightly concerned that it doesn't match the explanation I received
from some compiler guys, but I can chase that down separately.

Vinayak: sorry for leading you down the garden path on this. Please can you
stick with your original patch, but adding something equivalent for
arch/arm?
I have posted a patch for arch/arm, have tested it for ARM-v7.
Cheers,

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help