On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
[off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Grant, Boris:

(BTW, dropped Russell, Rob Landley and some unrelated mailing lists from Cc,
and added Thomas, Gregory and Rob Herring).

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:

quoted

On 05/02/2014 12:15, Grant Likely wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia [off-list ref] wrote:

[..]

quoted

quoted

quoted

Maybe we can discuss about it now?

   nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength.
   nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength.

I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable.

That's fine by me, if everybody agrees, let's go for the
nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-size couple then.

Great. So, if some DT dictator^C^Cmaintainers can Ack this binding,
I can send a new patchset, with pxa3xx-nand using it...

quoted

I'll rebase next version of my series on Ezequiel's patch providing
these OF helpers.

... and then you can base on it?

This is the original patchset:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58763

I've looked at both. Go ahead and add my a-b line:

Acked-by: Grant Likely <redacted>