Hi Gregory, Ezequiel,
>> Are we still in time to consider Emilio's oneline proposal?
quoted
(Emilio: would you mind preparing a suitable patch against dove,
kirkwood, armada370/xp, so we can see the real thing?).
The patch is in a common file, so it does not need patching anything for
each platform.
I am still strongly against this proposal because hard-coded the parent
clock name in the driver seems very wrong
It is hardcoded already when the parent is registered, so I do not
understand your concern.
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/clk/mvebu/common.c?v=3.13#L34
and moreover in some circumstances
(if there is no output-name, which is our default case) this proposal
just ignored the parent clock given by the device tree and this looked
more wrong.
I have sent a second patch addressing this comment, but you do not seem
to have taken too serious a look at it.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg305922.html
Cheers,
Emilio