[PATCHv2 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:25:34AM +0000, Laura Abbott wrote:

On 2/6/2014 6:09 PM, Courtney Cavin wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:02:31AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:

quoted

memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered
method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with
meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as
an intermediate.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <redacted>

[...]

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c
index 0b11c1a..51d814e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c

@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
  #include <linux/io.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
  #include <linux/reboot.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>

  #include <asm/setup.h>
  #include <asm/mach-types.h>

@@ -971,13 +972,9 @@ static void __init spitz_init(void)
         spitz_i2c_init();
  }

-static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline,
-                              struct meminfo *mi)
+static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline)
  {
-       sharpsl_save_param();
-       mi->nr_banks = 1;
-       mi->bank[0].start = 0xa0000000;
-       mi->bank[0].size = (64*1024*1024);
+       memblock_addr(0xa0000000, SZ_64M);

memblock_add() ?

Yes, that was a typo on my part. I'll send out a v3 with collected acks.

And better testing ;)

-- 
Catalin