[PATCHv2 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo
From: Courtney Cavin <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-07 02:08:17
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:02:31AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as an intermediate. Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <redacted>
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c index 0b11c1a..51d814e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/reboot.h> +#include <linux/memblock.h> #include <asm/setup.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h>@@ -971,13 +972,9 @@ static void __init spitz_init(void) spitz_i2c_init(); } -static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline, - struct meminfo *mi) +static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline) { - sharpsl_save_param(); - mi->nr_banks = 1; - mi->bank[0].start = 0xa0000000; - mi->bank[0].size = (64*1024*1024); + memblock_addr(0xa0000000, SZ_64M);
memblock_add() ? -Courtney