[PATCH RFC v2 2/2] Documentation: arm: define DT C-states bindings
From: Antti P Miettinen <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-27 12:48:15
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm
From: Antti P Miettinen <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-27 12:48:15
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <redacted>
That's why I defined the worst case. How did you implemented it in your idle drivers ? That would help generalize it, after all these bindings are there to simplify drivers upstreaming, feedback welcome.
Currently we do not handle this well downstream either. The problem with worst case is that the absolute worst case can be really bad and probability of it might be very low. Sorry - no ready answer :-) --Antti