[PATCH RFC v2 2/2] Documentation: arm: define DT C-states bindings
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2014-01-22 11:42:32
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:31:48PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:16:46AM +0000, Vincent Guittot wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ - psci-power-state + Usage: Required if entry-method property value is set to + "psci". + Value type: <u32> + Definition: power_state parameter to pass to the PSCI + suspend call to enter the C-state.
quoted
Why psci has got a dedicated field and not vendor methods ? can't you make that more generic ?
If anyone provides me with an example usage why not, for now I know I need that parameter for PSCI, I can call it differently, define it for PSCI and leave it as optional for other methods.
Would it not be sensible to define a PSCI binding that extends this and other bindings - ISTR some other properties getting scattered into bindings for it? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140122/08080b74/attachment.sig>