Hi Vinod,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Srikanth Thokala [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Vinod,

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Vinod Koul [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:24:27PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:

quoted

On 01/24/2014 12:16 PM, Srikanth Thokala wrote:

quoted

Hi Lars,

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 01/22/2014 05:52 PM, Srikanth Thokala wrote:
[...]

quoted

+/**
+ * xilinx_vdma_device_control - Configure DMA channel of the device
+ * @dchan: DMA Channel pointer
+ * @cmd: DMA control command
+ * @arg: Channel configuration
+ *
+ * Return: '0' on success and failure value on error
+ */
+static int xilinx_vdma_device_control(struct dma_chan *dchan,
+                                   enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd, unsigned long arg)
+{
+     struct xilinx_vdma_chan *chan = to_xilinx_chan(dchan);
+
+     switch (cmd) {
+     case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
+             xilinx_vdma_terminate_all(chan);
+             return 0;
+     case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
+             return xilinx_vdma_slave_config(chan,
+                                     (struct xilinx_vdma_config *)arg);

You really shouldn't be overloading the generic API with your own semantics.
DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG should take a dma_slave_config and nothing else.

Ok.  The driver needs few additional configuration from the slave
device like Vertical
Size, Horizontal Size,  Stride etc., for the DMA transfers, in that case do you
suggest me to define a separate dma_ctrl_cmd like the one FSLDMA_EXTERNAL_START
defined for Freescale drivers?

In my opinion it is not a good idea to have driver implement a generic API,
but at the same time let the driver have custom semantics for those API
calls. It's a bit like having a gpio driver that expects 23 and 42 as the
values passed to gpio_set_value instead of 0 and 1. It completely defeats
the purpose of a generic API, namely that you are able to write generic code
that makes use of the API without having to know about which implementation
API it is talking to. The dmaengine framework provides the
dmaengine_prep_interleaved_dma() function to setup two dimensional
transfers, e.g. take a look at sirf-dma.c or imx-dma.c.

The question here i think would be waht this device supports? Is the hardware
capable of doing interleaved transfers, then would make sense.

While we do try to get users use dma_slave_config, but there will always be
someone who have specfic params. If we can generalize then we might want to add
to the dma_slave_config as well

There are many configuration parameters which are specific to IP and I
would like to
give an overview of some of parameteres here:

1) Park Mode ('cfg->park'): In Park mode, engine will park on frame
referenced by
    'cfg->park_frm', so user will have control on each frame in this mode.

2) Interrupt Coalesce ('cfg->coalesce'):  Used for setting interrupt
threshold. This value
   determines the number of frame buffers to process. To use this feature,
   'cfg->frm_cnt_en' should be set.

3) Frame Synchronization Source ('cfg->ext_fsync'):  Can be an
external/internal frame
    synchronization source. Used to synchronize one channel (MM2S/S2MM) with
    another (S2MM/MM2S) channel.

4) Genlock Synchronization ('cfg->genlock'): Used to avoid mismatch rate between
    master and slave.  In master mode (cfg->master), frames are not dropped and
    slave can drop frames to adjust to master frame rate.

And in future, this Engine being a soft IP, we could expect some more additional
parameters.  Isn't a good idea to have a private member in dma_slave_config for
sharing additional configuration between slave device and dma engine? Or a new
dma_ctrl_cmd like FSLDMA_EXTERNAL_START?

Ping?

Srikanth

quoted

--
~Vinod
--/EX
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/