Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2014-01-14

[PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq driver depends on SOC_IMX6Q/SOC_IMX6SL

From: John Tobias <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-13 04:55:57
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

That's ok.

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Shawn Guo [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:39:52PM -0800, John Tobias wrote:
quoted
The ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, HAVE_IMX_ANATOP and PM_OPP are moved up to ARCH_MCX.
The driver should show if the SOC_IMX6Q and/or SOC_IMX6SL is/are selected.

Signed-off-by: John Tobias <redacted>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index 3ba5dcc..230c663 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ config ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ

 config ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ
      tristate "Freescale i.MX6 cpufreq support"
-     depends on ARCH_MXC
+     depends on SOC_IMX6Q || SOC_IMX6SL
No.  We do not want to touch this line where there is another IMX6xx can
reuse the driver.  Depending on ARCH_MXC is good enough, since we
already have the symbol prompt and help text to tell the targets that
the driver supports.

Shawn
quoted
      depends on REGULATOR_ANATOP
      help
        This adds cpufreq driver support for Freescale i.MX6 series SoCs.
--
1.8.3.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help