Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 8 authors, 2014-02-24

[PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain

From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-12 11:47:24
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On Sat 2014-01-11 20:42:43, Tomasz Figa wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch removes name field from private s3c64xx_pm_domain struct and
moves domain name to dedicated field of generic_pm_domain struct.

When at it, beautify the names a bit, since they are used by genpd core
as message prefixes.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c
index 8cdb824..5238d66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
 #include "regs-syscon-power.h"
 
 struct s3c64xx_pm_domain {
-	char *const name;
 	u32 ena;
 	u32 pwr_stat;
 	struct generic_pm_domain pd;
@@ -76,7 +75,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_pd_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
 		} while (retry--);
 
 		if (!retry) {
-			pr_err("Failed to start domain %s\n", pd->name);
+			pr_err("Failed to start domain %s\n", pd->pd.name);
 			return -EBUSY;
 		}

So you changed text "failed to start domain I" to "failed to start
domain domain_i". Not sure that's an improvement...?

Could we get some more descriptive names for the domains?


 static struct s3c64xx_pm_domain s3c64xx_pm_i = {
-	.name = "I",
 	.ena = S3C64XX_NORMALCFG_DOMAIN_I_ON,
 	.pwr_stat = S3C64XX_BLKPWRSTAT_I,
 	.pd = {
+		.name = "domain_i",
 		.power_off = s3c64xx_pd_off,
 		.power_on = s3c64xx_pd_on,
 	},
 };
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help