On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:20:23PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
quoted
From: Wolfram Sang <redacted>
Tested with RIIC2 on a genmai board. Others untested but hopefully
trivial enough to be added.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <redacted>
Acked-by: Magnus Damm <redacted>
---
V2: adapt to established sorting
Thanks. This seems safe enough and I will queue it up.
Note that after dropping these lines:
CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee000.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP97]),
CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee400.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP96]),
CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee800.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP95]),
CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfeec00.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP94]),
i2c stopped working.
??? Why do you want to drop these lines?
If the i2c clocks are not registered, you won't get i2c support? Am I
missing something?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131226/1883389c/attachment.sig>