[PATCH v4] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib
From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-05 20:28:37
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-serial
Hello Nicolas, On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:57:04PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 04/12/2013 20:16, Uwe Kleine-K?nig :quoted
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:09:11AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:quoted
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:23:53AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:quoted
Hello Greg, hi Nicolas, On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:quoted
On 13/11/2013 17:28, Nicolas Ferre :quoted
On 07/11/2013 10:25, Linus Walleij :quoted
This passes the errata fix using a GPIO to control the RTS pin on one of the AT91 chips to use gpiolib instead of the AT91-specific interfaces. Also remove the reliance on compile-time #defines and the cpu_* check and rely on the platform passing down the proper GPIO pin through platform data. This is a prerequisite for getting rid of the local GPIO implementation in the AT91 platform and move toward multiplatform. The patch also adds device tree support for getting the RTS GPIO pin from the device tree on DT boot paths. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <redacted> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>[...]quoted
nferre: What is your plan with this patch? Do you have patches depending on it, too, or is it ok if I take it?Well, the problem is that your branch generates conflicts with the at91/cleanup one that Olof have just pulled. They are not big conflicts, only additions of header files at the same location. Maybe you can rebase your branch on top of this cleanup branch (arm-soc/next/cleanup: 94c5216ee93b3b4).
Olof said on irc: "that's easy to fix, i'm ok with resolving that when i merge". That is what I prefer because I don't want to retest everything after rebasing.
But, anyway I feel that it is better if you take the whole series in a raw.
So I can interpret this as your blessing to keep the patch in my series based on 3.13-rc1? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |