Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 6 authors, 2014-02-03

[PATCH v4] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-04 19:16:29
Also in: linux-gpio, linux-serial

Hello Greg,

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:09:11AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:23:53AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
quoted
Hello Greg, hi Nicolas,

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:47:50AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
quoted
On 13/11/2013 17:28, Nicolas Ferre :
quoted
On 07/11/2013 10:25, Linus Walleij :
quoted
This passes the errata fix using a GPIO to control the RTS pin
on one of the AT91 chips to use gpiolib instead of the
AT91-specific interfaces. Also remove the reliance on
compile-time #defines and the cpu_* check and rely on the
platform passing down the proper GPIO pin through platform
data.

This is a prerequisite for getting rid of the local GPIO
implementation in the AT91 platform and move toward
multiplatform.

The patch also adds device tree support for getting the
RTS GPIO pin from the device tree on DT boot paths.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <redacted>
Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Hi Greg,

You acknowledged a previous version of this patch which was taking a
different approach with the subject:
"[PATCH 1/4] ARM/serial: at91: move machine quirk into machine"

In order to integrate the series build by Linus in our AT91/arm-soc
flow, would you mind reviewing this v4 patch and eventually giving your
blessing ;-)
If it is okay on your side, I'll integrate it in a pull-request to
arm-soc for 3.14.
Greg, ping?
I'm depending on that patch for a series that gets rid of ARM's
<mach/timex.h>. So I'm interested to either get a stable commit to
base on or alternatively to get the blessing from both of you to take it
(also via arm-soc) as part of my series.

A preview of my series is available at

	git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git deprecatemachtimexh
No objection from me to take it through your tree.
gregkh: Thanks. I'll interpret this as Acked-by: you if Nicolas also
agrees that I take it.

nferre: What is your plan with this patch? Do you have patches
depending on it, too, or is it ok if I take it?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help