[PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: tps6586x: add version detection
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2013-12-04 11:49:45
Also in:
linux-tegra, lkml
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2013-12-04 11:49:45
Also in:
linux-tegra, lkml
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:07:28AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013, Stefan Agner wrote:
quoted
As I pointed out in the comment above, the struct tps6586x is in the C file, so I would need to move that too. That's why I did not made that change in the end. What do you think, should I still move (and move the struct too?)
Why would the struct have to be moved if the function is inline?
If the function is in the header and trying to use a struct that's only defined in the C file then it's not going to build - keeping the struct in the C file only does seem like a worthwhile thing for encapsulation. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131204/971a8602/attachment.sig>