On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 08:30:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

On 23 October 2013 20:06, Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

So, you have actually tested your code without interrupt handler?

No.

It would be better if you atleast try this and confirm that this dummy
handler is required.

Hi Viresh

I have tested this now. The dummy handler is required. Without it, it
seems like the WFI exits at the next timer tick, not immediately once
the cpufreq change has finished. I get poor numbers out of
cpufreq-bench without the handler.

	      Andrew