[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: shmobile: BOCK-W reference: add Ether PFC settings
flat view
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2013-09-26 01:51:42
Also in:
linux-sh
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:54:36PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello. On 09/25/2013 08:47 AM, Simon Horman wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Add the Ether pin group to bockw_pinctrl_map[].quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <redacted>quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
--- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Index: renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c ===================================================================--- renesas.orig/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c +++ renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ */ static const struct pinctrl_map bockw_pinctrl_map[] = { + /* Ether */ + PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("fde00000.ethernet", "pfc-r8a7778", + "ether_rmii", "ether"), /* SCIF0 */ PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("sh-sci.0", "pfc-r8a7778", "scif0_data_a", "scif0"),quoted
quoted
quoted
Hi Sergei,quoted
quoted
quoted
Thanks for your patches. In general I think your series looks fine. I have a single comment, and that's about the pinctrl-related hunk above. I can see that this patch is for DT reference for Bock-W, so I expect the code to be in DT. Do you have any plans to use DT to describe the pinmux bits? Perhaps you have some incremental patch planned?quoted
quoted
No, I just repeated what I saw mechanically. Now I'm seeing some evidence that PFC driver supports the device tree, so I probably need to redo the patchset... let me study this question better.quoted
Ping.Sorry, I got distracted by other work and didn't advance much here. Will try to respin the patchset before my vacation (next Monday). Although the driver DT support patch have seemingly stalemated due to the most recent comments...
Thanks for the update. I guess the key is to move forward on the driver side, somehow.