[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: shmobile: BOCK-W reference: add Ether PFC settings
flat view
STALE4748d
From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman)
Date: 2013-09-25 04:47:20
Also in:
linux-sh
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:14:28PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello. On 09-09-2013 11:05, Magnus Damm wrote:quoted
quoted
Add the Ether pin group to bockw_pinctrl_map[].quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <redacted>quoted
quoted
--- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Index: renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c ===================================================================--- renesas.orig/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c +++ renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ */ static const struct pinctrl_map bockw_pinctrl_map[] = { + /* Ether */ + PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("fde00000.ethernet", "pfc-r8a7778", + "ether_rmii", "ether"), /* SCIF0 */ PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("sh-sci.0", "pfc-r8a7778", "scif0_data_a", "scif0"),quoted
Hi Sergei,quoted
Thanks for your patches. In general I think your series looks fine. I have a single comment, and that's about the pinctrl-related hunk above. I can see that this patch is for DT reference for Bock-W, so I expect the code to be in DT. Do you have any plans to use DT to describe the pinmux bits? Perhaps you have some incremental patch planned?No, I just repeated what I saw mechanically. Now I'm seeing some evidence that PFC driver supports the device tree, so I probably need to redo the patchset... let me study this question better.
Ping.