[PATCH v3 0/8] Add the Quadspi driver for vf610-twr
From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse)
Date: 2013-09-12 16:26:12
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 00:12 -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
I will send you the datasheet tomorrow.
Thanks. Although according to the date header on your email, it is *already* tomorrow. Any chance of fixing your clock, please?
Mark and you want to create the LUT instruction sequence at the runtime,
But there is some disadvantage if we do so:
[1] low efficiency:
If you want to change the LUT regitster, you should unlock the LUT
register, and change the LUT regitsters, and lock the LUT
regitsters again.Although there aren't *that* many operations we perform, so you'd quite quickly find yourself using things which are *already* programmed into the LUT instead of having to re-program them again, surely?
[2] we may can not create all the LUT instruction sequence at the
runtime. For example, the buffer program(OPCODE_PP):
the m25p80_write() may write 256bytes at a time, but the Quadspi
controller only has a 64-byte TX-FIFO, so the controller should
write a 64bytes firstly, then sends to the NOR with a read-status
command. Do you want to create a read-status LUT instruction
sequence at run time? This is not good solution, we should
pre-populate the read-status LUT information.I'm not entirely sure I understand this. What *exactly* happens "on the wire" in this case? Do you really send an OPCODE_RDSR (0x05) byte on the wire somehow, when you're supposed to be in the middle of sending the page data to the chip? How does the chip handle that?
[3] We may can not create the LUT instruction sequence at the runtime,
since we can not get enough information from the spi_transfer{}.
A whole LUT instruction sequence may needs the following info:
1.) spi command.
2.) lines info: single line, dual lines, quad lines.
3.) Address width: 3 bytes address or 4 bytes address.
4.) instruction type: Read or write or other.
5.) length info: how many bytes for this transaction .
6.) dummy info: how many dummy is needed for this transaction.
We can not get the dummy info from the spi_transfer{} Again, what does that actually *mean*, on the wire? I thought SPI was just 'send some bytes, fetch some bytes'. Why is the controller doing anything other than that? -- dwmw2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5745 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130912/1198ff3f/attachment.bin>