On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 15:58:06 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:

Hi,

On 24/09/13 14:50, Mateusz Krawczuk wrote:

quoted

+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+* Samsung S5PC110/S5PV210 Clock Controller
+
+The S5PV210 clock controller generates and supplies clock to various controllers
+within the SoC. The clock binding described here is applicable to all SoCs in
+the S5PC110/S5PV210 family.
+
+Required Properties:
+
+- compatible: should be "samsung,s5pv210-clock".

I have nothing against this compatible value, but wouldn't it be more
accurate to use, e.g. "samsung,s5pv210-cmu" - for Clock Management Unit,
as this IP block is also referred to in the documentation ?

May just be me, but "samsung,s5pv210-clock" sounds like just one
specific clock type.

In the user's manual I have, this IP is referred to either as "CMU", as
you suggested, or simply as "clock controller". "CMU" is not very
meaningfull, so "samsung,s5pv210-clock-controller" would be the best here
I guess, but for consistency with other Samsung's clock bindings, I'd
suggest leaving this as is in the patch.

Best regards,
Tomasz