[PATCH 3/4] ARM: STi: Supply I2C configuration to STiH415 SoC
From: Maxime COQUELIN <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-18 12:39:00
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-i2c, lkml
On 09/18/2013 02:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:quoted
This patch supplies I2C configuration to STiH415 SoC. Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <redacted> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <redacted> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi index 1d322b2..e56449d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415-pinctrl.dtsi@@ -86,6 +86,24 @@ }; }; }; + + sbc_i2c0 { + pinctrl_sbc_i2c0_default: sbc_i2c0-default { + st,pins { + sda = <&PIO4 6 ALT1 BIDIR>; + scl = <&PIO4 5 ALT1 BIDIR>; + }; + }; + }; + + sbc_i2c1 { + pinctrl_sbc_i2c1_default: sbc_i2c1-default { + st,pins { + sda = <&PIO3 2 ALT2 BIDIR>; + scl = <&PIO3 1 ALT2 BIDIR>; + }; + }; + }; }; pin-controller-front {@@ -143,6 +161,24 @@ reg = <0x7000 0x100>; st,bank-name = "PIO12"; }; + + i2c0 { + pinctrl_i2c0_default: i2c0-default { + st,pins { + sda = <&PIO9 3 ALT1 BIDIR>; + scl = <&PIO9 2 ALT1 BIDIR>; + }; + }; + }; + + i2c1 { + pinctrl_i2c1_default: i2c1-default { + st,pins { + sda = <&PIO12 1 ALT1 BIDIR>; + scl = <&PIO12 0 ALT1 BIDIR>; + }; + }; + }; }; pin-controller-rear {diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi index 74ab8de..643ae1c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih415.dtsi@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include "stih41x.dtsi" #include "stih415-clock.dtsi" #include "stih415-pinctrl.dtsi" +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> / { L2: cache-controller {@@ -83,5 +84,61 @@ pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_serial1>; }; + + i2c0: i2c at fed40000{Space before the '{'.
It will be fixed in next series
quoted
+ compatible = "st,comms-i2c"; + status = "disabled";Consider putting the node status at the bottom.
Ok.
quoted
+ reg = <0xfed40000 0x110>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 187 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + clocks = <&CLKS_ICN_REG_0>; + clock-frequency = <400000>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c0_default>; + st,glitches; + st,glitch-clk = <500>; + st,glitch-dat = <500>; + }; + + i2c1: i2c at fed41000{Same here and throughout.
Ok.
quoted
+ compatible = "st,comms-i2c"; + status = "disabled";Same here and throughout.
Ok.
quoted
+ reg = <0xfed41000 0x110>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 188 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + clocks = <&CLKS_ICN_REG_0>; + clock-frequency = <400000>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c1_default>; + st,glitches; + st,glitch-clk = <500>; + st,glitch-dat = <500>; + }; + + sbc_i2c0: i2c at fe540000{ + compatible = "st,comms-i2c"; + status = "disabled"; + reg = <0xfe540000 0x110>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 206 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + clocks = <&CLK_SYSIN>; + clock-frequency = <400000>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_i2c0_default>; + st,glitches; + st,glitch-clk = <500>; + st,glitch-dat = <500>; + }; + + sbc_i2c1: i2c at fe541000{ + compatible = "st,comms-i2c"; + status = "disabled"; + reg = <0xfe541000 0x110>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 207 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + clocks = <&CLK_SYSIN>; + clock-frequency = <400000>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_sbc_i2c1_default>; + st,glitches; + st,glitch-clk = <500>; + st,glitch-dat = <500>; + }; }; };Is this odd tabbing just the result of the patch format?
This is just the result of the patch format. Regards, Maxime