Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 5 authors, 2013-08-28
STALE4676d
Revisions (14)
  1. v3 [diff vs current]
  2. v3 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]
  5. v4 [diff vs current]
  6. v4 [diff vs current]
  7. v4 current
  8. v4 [diff vs current]
  9. v4 [diff vs current]
  10. v4 [diff vs current]
  11. v4 [diff vs current]
  12. v4 [diff vs current]
  13. v4 [diff vs current]
  14. v5 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: bcm281xx: Add GPIO driver

From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
Date: 2013-08-19 19:11:50

Le lundi 19 ao?t 2013 12:05:55 Markus Mayer a ?crit :
On 19 August 2013 12:02, Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hello Markus,

Le lundi 19 ao?t 2013 11:59:19 Markus Mayer a ?crit :
quoted
From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>

This patch adds the GPIO driver for the bcm281xx family of chips.

Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Christian Daudt <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Tim Kryger <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Matt Porter <redacted>
---

 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.txt     |   43 ++
Since the vendor prefix has been changed from brcm to bcm, should that
also be reflected in the Device Tree binding documentation file?
Actually, it is the other way around. "brcm," was there first, but we
overlooked that and started upstreaming code with the "bcm," vendor
prefix. There are various patches floating around out there to change
our use of "bcm," to "brcm," to make it conform to the established
vendor prefixes.
Ermm yes, I realized that after hitting send. Netherless, should this be 
renamed to "gpio-brcm-kona.txt" directly such that the patches you mention do 
not have to get updated to patch this one too?
-- 
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help