[PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: split sam9x5 peripheral definitions

2013/8/7 boris brezillon [off-list ref]:

Hello Richard,


On 07/08/2013 12:38, Richard Genoud wrote:

quoted

2013/8/7 Boris BREZILLON [off-list ref]:

quoted

This patch splits the sam9x5 peripheral definitions into:
- a common base for all sam9x5 SoCs (at91sam9x5.dtsi)
- several optional peripheral definitions which will be included by
specific
   sam9x5 SoCs (at91sam9x5_'periph name'.dtsi)

This provides a better representation of the real hardware (drop unneeded
dt nodes) and avoids future peripheral id conflict (lcdc and isi both use
peripheral id 25).

Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <redacted>
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g25.dtsi       |    2 +
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g35.dtsi       |    1 +
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x25.dtsi       |   24 ++---------
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x35.dtsi       |    1 +
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi        |   67
------------------------------
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb0.dtsi  |   56
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb1.dtsi  |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_usart3.dtsi |   51 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  8 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb0.dtsi
  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_macb1.dtsi
  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_usart3.dtsi

[snip]

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_usart3.dtsi

b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_usart3.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5589579

--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_usart3.dtsi

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * at91sam9x5_lcdc.dtsi - Device Tree Include file for AT91SAM9x5 SoC

with
+ * 4 USART.

One minor comment mistake here !

Nice catch!

I'll fix it for the next version.

BTW did you test it (I didn't: I don't have any board with this SoC family)
?

Not yet, will do it !

This separation was formerly done in the "at91 common clk" series but I
removed it
from the new version (which I will submit soon) to ease the review and
tests.

ok !

Thanks,
Richard