On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:48:27AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:

2013/7/9 Mark Brown [off-list ref]:

quoted

...this first example is now invalid and should probably just be being
extended with the new required properties.

Well, I have to rewrite that to make it clearer.
The thing is:
with "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc" the SSC doesn't work with DMA.
with "atmel,at91sam9g45-ssc", the SSC work ONLY with DMA.

So the dmas/dma-names properties are only required for g45-ssc, and
useless for rm9200-ssc

Maybe the best will be to write a paragraph for g45-ssc and another
for rm9200-ssc, even if there's some identical lines between them.

OK, or just write a section "Required for devices with compatible X".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130710/2065b88d/attachment.sig>