[PATCH v4 3/7] Documentation: DT: update atmel SSC with DMA binding
From: Richard Genoud <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-10 09:48:49
Also in:
alsa-devel, linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Richard Genoud <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-10 09:48:49
Also in:
alsa-devel, linux-devicetree, lkml
2013/7/9 Mark Brown [off-list ref]:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 04:25:29PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:quoted
- reg: Should contain SSC registers location and length - interrupts: Should contain SSC interrupt +For dma transfer: +- dmas: DMA specifier, consisting of a phandle to DMA controller node, + the memory interface and SSC DMA channel ID (for tx and rx). + See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-dma.txt for details. +- dma-names: Must be "tx", "rx".This is added as a required property so...quoted
-Example: +Examples: ssc0: ssc at fffbc000 { compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc"; reg = <0xfffbc000 0x4000>; interrupts = <14 4 5>; };...this first example is now invalid and should probably just be being extended with the new required properties.
Well, I have to rewrite that to make it clearer. The thing is: with "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc" the SSC doesn't work with DMA. with "atmel,at91sam9g45-ssc", the SSC work ONLY with DMA. So the dmas/dma-names properties are only required for g45-ssc, and useless for rm9200-ssc Maybe the best will be to write a paragraph for g45-ssc and another for rm9200-ssc, even if there's some identical lines between them. Thanks ! Richard.