Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 4 authors, 2013-07-17

BUG: commit "ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs" breaks armv5 with CONFIG_PREEMPT

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2013-06-20 13:01:10

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:47:25PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 06/20/2013 01:39 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
quoted
On 06/20/2013 01:35 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
quoted
On 06/20/2013 01:12 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
We may need to place the preempt disable/enable at a higher level in the
scheduler. My theory is that we have a context switch from prev to next.
We get preempted just before finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), so the MMU
hasn't been switched yet. The new switch during preemption happens to a
thread with the same next mm, so the scheduler no longer switch_mm() and
the TIF_SWITCH_MM isn't set for the new thread.

I'll come back with another patch shortly.
Here's another attempt (as before, only compile-tested):
booting kernel from /image
zImage: concatenated oftree detected
booting Linux kernel with devicetree

...dead...

Does every process have a "mm"? Even Kernel threads?
I've added a check for "mm". Boots now and my test runs stable for 3
minutes now.
Ah, good point.
I'm not sure if we have to check for "mm" in
check_and_switch_context(), too.
switch_mm() wouldn't be called with a NULL mm, hence we wouldn't call
check_and_switch_context() either. finish_arch_post_lock_switch() is
called all the time (and we set the TIF flag only if switch_mm() was
called).

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help