BUG: commit "ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs" breaks armv5 with CONFIG_PREEMPT
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2013-06-20 13:01:10
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:47:25PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 06/20/2013 01:39 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:quoted
On 06/20/2013 01:35 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:quoted
On 06/20/2013 01:12 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
We may need to place the preempt disable/enable at a higher level in the scheduler. My theory is that we have a context switch from prev to next. We get preempted just before finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), so the MMU hasn't been switched yet. The new switch during preemption happens to a thread with the same next mm, so the scheduler no longer switch_mm() and the TIF_SWITCH_MM isn't set for the new thread. I'll come back with another patch shortly.Here's another attempt (as before, only compile-tested):booting kernel from /image zImage: concatenated oftree detected booting Linux kernel with devicetree ...dead... Does every process have a "mm"? Even Kernel threads?I've added a check for "mm". Boots now and my test runs stable for 3 minutes now.
Ah, good point.
I'm not sure if we have to check for "mm" in check_and_switch_context(), too.
switch_mm() wouldn't be called with a NULL mm, hence we wouldn't call check_and_switch_context() either. finish_arch_post_lock_switch() is called all the time (and we set the TIF flag only if switch_mm() was called). Thanks. -- Catalin