Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 4 authors, 2013-07-17

BUG: commit "ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs" breaks armv5 with CONFIG_PREEMPT

From: mkl@pengutronix.de (Marc Kleine-Budde)
Date: 2013-06-20 10:08:58
Subsystem: arm port, the rest · Maintainers: Russell King, Linus Torvalds

On 06/20/2013 11:57 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Marc,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:43:33AM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
quoted
on current linus/master on armv5 we observed stack trashing[1] on high
load. I bisected this problem down to commit:
quoted
b9d4d42ad901cc848ac87f1cb8923fded3645568 is the first bad commit
commit b9d4d42ad901cc848ac87f1cb8923fded3645568
Author: Catalin Marinas [off-list ref]
Date:   Mon Nov 28 21:57:24 2011 +0000

    ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs

    This patch removes the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition for
    ARMv5 and earlier processors. On such processors, the context switch
    requires a full cache flush. To avoid high interrupt latencies, this
    patch defers the mm switching to the post-lock switch hook if the
    interrupts are disabled.

    Reviewed-by: Will Deacon [off-list ref]
    Tested-by: Will Deacon [off-list ref]
    Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand [off-list ref]
    Tested-by: Marc Zyngier [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas [off-list ref]

:040000 040000 034899bdcbc9aa59b5455a85a9d78b646b4cf784 ecc23e33a4ca807d4153f87fbea85a9437ff2928 M      arch
The problem can be reproduced on several mx28 and an at91sam9263 and
only occurs of CONFIG_PREEMPT (Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop))
is enabled.

I have the gut feeling that the "if (irqs_disabled())" check in the
above patch is not correct for CONFIG_PREEMPT.
The check is there to avoid long interrupt latencies (flushing the whole
cache with interrupts disabled during context switch). You can drop the
check and always call cpu_switch_mm() to confirm that it fixes the
faults.
I have disabled the check:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index a7b85e0..7b3f67f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
        if (unlikely(mm->context.vmalloc_seq != init_mm.context.vmalloc_seq))
                __check_vmalloc_seq(mm);

-       if (irqs_disabled())
+       if (0 && irqs_disabled())
                /*
                 * cpu_switch_mm() needs to flush the VIVT caches. To avoid
                 * high interrupt latencies, defer the call and continue
...and the test is running without problems, while I'm writing this
email. No more segfaults so far.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
finish_task_switch() calls finish_arch_post_lock_switch() after the
interrupts have been enabled so that the CPU can actually switch the mm.
I wonder whether we could actually be preempted after
finish_lock_switch() but before we actually switched the MMU.

Here's an untested patch (trying to keep it in the arch/arm code):

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index a7b85e0..ded85e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -39,17 +39,20 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	if (unlikely(mm->context.vmalloc_seq != init_mm.context.vmalloc_seq))
 		__check_vmalloc_seq(mm);
 
-	if (irqs_disabled())
+	if (irqs_disabled()) {
 		/*
 		 * cpu_switch_mm() needs to flush the VIVT caches. To avoid
 		 * high interrupt latencies, defer the call and continue
 		 * running with the old mm. Since we only support UP systems
 		 * on non-ASID CPUs, the old mm will remain valid until the
-		 * finish_arch_post_lock_switch() call.
+		 * finish_arch_post_lock_switch() call. Preemption needs to be
+		 * disabled until the MMU is switched.
 		 */
 		set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(tsk), TIF_SWITCH_MM);
-	else
+		preempt_disable();
+	} else {
 		cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
+	}
 }
 
 #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
@@ -59,6 +62,10 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
 	if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SWITCH_MM)) {
 		struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
 		cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
+		/*
+		 * Preemption disabled in check_and_switch_context().
+		 */
+		preempt_enable();
 	}
 }
Will now reboot to test your patch.

thanks,
Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130620/510c114b/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help