On 13 June 2013 03:02, Andrew Bresticker [off-list ref] wrote:

Tomasz,

quoted

quoted

+     apll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_apll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x100);
+     bpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_bpll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x20110);
+     cpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_cpll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10120);
+     dpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_dpll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10128);
+     epll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_epll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10130);
+     ipll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_ipll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10150);
+     kpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_kpll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x28100);
+     mpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_mpll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10180);
+     rpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_rpll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10140);
+     spll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_spll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10160);
+     vpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_vpll", "oscclk",
+                     reg_base + 0x10170);

Are all those PLLs really PLL35xx? At least for VPLL and EPLL a PLL
without the K factor looks a bit awkward.

No they are not...  EPLL and RPLL should be pll36xx, but the rest are pll35xx.

Yes EPLL and RPLL are pll36xx.
Thanks for pointing out.

Thanks,
Andrew

--
with warm regards,
Chander Kashyap