Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 12 authors, 2013-06-17
STALE4746d

[PATCH 13/13] ARM: Exynos: extend soft-reset support for Exynos5420

From: Chander Kashyap <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-11 13:24:32
Also in: linux-samsung-soc, linux-serial

On 10 June 2013 14:24, Kukjin Kim [off-list ref] wrote:
Tushar Behera wrote:
quoted
On 06/06/2013 04:31 PM, Chander Kashyap wrote:
quoted
Extend the soft reset support for Exynos5420 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index fbe1aa7..dc7c134 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ void exynos5_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
    u32 val;
    void __iomem *addr;

-   if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) {
+   if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250") ||
+           (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420"))) {
            val = 0x1;
            addr = EXYNOS_SWRESET;
    } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
How about making 0x1 and EXYNOS_SWRESET as default values of val and
addr. That way we can remove this check for exynos5250 and exynos5420.
Also we can remove the trailing else statement as there are no non-DT
boards for EXYNOS5.

 void exynos5_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
 {
        struct device_node *np;
-       u32 val;
-       void __iomem *addr;
+       u32 val = 0x1;
+       void __iomem *addr = EXYNOS_SWRESET;

-       if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) {
-               val = 0x1;
-               addr = EXYNOS_SWRESET;
-       } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
+       if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")) {
                u32 status;
                np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
"samsung,exynos5440-clock");
@@ -336,9 +333,6 @@ void exynos5_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
                val = __raw_readl(addr);

                val = (val & 0xffff0000) | (status & 0xffff);
-       } else {
-               pr_err("%s: cannot support non-DT\n", __func__);
-               return;
        }

--
Yeah, looks better.
Yes i will do the change. Thanks
- Kukjin


--
with warm regards,
Chander Kashyap
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help