Hi Felipe,

On 06/27/2013 08:17 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:00:34PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:

quoted

Hi,

On 06/25/2013 05:06 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:

quoted

quoted

+static struct platform_driver exynos_video_phy_driver = {

quoted

+	.probe	= exynos_video_phy_probe,

you *must* provide a remove method. drivers with NULL remove are
non-removable :-)

Actually the remove() callback can be NULL, it's just missing module_exit
function that makes a module not unloadable.

look at the implementation of platform_drv_remove():

 499 static int platform_drv_remove(struct device *_dev)
 500 {
 501         struct platform_driver *drv = to_platform_driver(_dev->driver);
 502         struct platform_device *dev = to_platform_device(_dev);
 503         int ret;
 504 
 505         ret = drv->remove(dev);
 506         if (ACPI_HANDLE(_dev))
 507                 acpi_dev_pm_detach(_dev, true);
 508 
 509         return ret;
 510 }

that's not a conditional call right :-)

It is conditional, just condition check is in different place:

int platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *drv)
{
	(...)
	if (drv->remove)
		drv->driver.remove = platform_drv_remove;
	(...)
}


Regards
Andrzej

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel