On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:47:13PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:

Hi,

On 06/25/2013 10:54 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+static int exynos_video_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

quoted

 >>  +{
 >>  +	struct exynos_video_phy *state;
 >>  +	struct device *dev =&pdev->dev;
 >>  +	struct resource *res;
 >>  +	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
 >>  +	int i;
 >>  +
 >>  +	state = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
 >>  +	if (!state)
 >>  +		return -ENOMEM;
 >>  +
 >>  +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 >>  +
 >>  +	state->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
 >>  +	if (IS_ERR(state->regs))
 >>  +		return PTR_ERR(state->regs);
 >>  +
 >>  +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, state);

 >
 >  you can use platform_set_drvdata(pdev, state);

 I had it in the previous version, but changed for symmetry with
 dev_set_drvdata(). I guess those could be replaced with
 phy_{get, set}_drvdata as you suggested.

hmm, you do need to set the drvdata() to the phy object, but also to the
pdev object (should you need it on a suspend/resume callback, for
instance). Those are separate struct device instances.

Indeed, I somehow confused phy->dev with with phy->dev.parent. I'm going
to just drop the above call, since the pdev drvdata is currently not
referenced anywhere.

ok cool :-)

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130626/dc970476/attachment.sig>