Hi Arnd,

On Friday 22 February 2013 04:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:56 +0530 Vineet Gupta [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

I guess you'll have to do something similar for arch/metag, and Vineet
will do it for arch/arc.

After getting the tip-bot msg about Stephen's patch for -mm, I never saw it in
-next and thus was not sure how when it will start showing up in -next.

It arrived in next-21030220.

quoted

quoted

quoted

Stephen's patch is currently in Andrew's tree, and I don't see an easy
way to coordinate this. The patch we will need once both are merged
is below.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

FWIW:
Acked-by: James Hogan <redacted> (for arch/metag)

Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <redacted> (for arch/arc)

So this means Stephen's patch - once merged will take care of existing in-tree
arches and your's will take care of metag/arc.

The easiest way would be to put the follow up patches in Andrew's patch
set (since it is still based on top of linux-next).  It usually is merged
pretty late, so I would get your own trees merged ASAP and this can be
taken care of when Andrew sends his patch set to Linus.

Have you queued up this change via one of your trees already for 3.9-rcX ?
If not, I can fold it in with a bunch of Kconfig cleanups for ARC
(GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK, HAVE_IRQ_WORK), given that those bits are already in linus'
tree.

Thx,
-Vineet