Hi,

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:56 +0530 Vineet Gupta [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

I guess you'll have to do something similar for arch/metag, and Vineet
will do it for arch/arc.

After getting the tip-bot msg about Stephen's patch for -mm, I never saw it in
-next and thus was not sure how when it will start showing up in -next.

It arrived in next-21030220.

quoted

quoted

Stephen's patch is currently in Andrew's tree, and I don't see an easy
way to coordinate this. The patch we will need once both are merged
is below.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

FWIW:
Acked-by: James Hogan <redacted> (for arch/metag)

Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <redacted> (for arch/arc)

So this means Stephen's patch - once merged will take care of existing in-tree
arches and your's will take care of metag/arc.

The easiest way would be to put the follow up patches in Andrew's patch
set (since it is still based on top of linux-next).  It usually is merged
pretty late, so I would get your own trees merged ASAP and this can be
taken care of when Andrew sends his patch set to Linus.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130222/bd744617/attachment-0001.sig>