[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit

[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit · Richard Zhao <hidden> · 2012-12-21
[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2012-12-21
[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit · pgaikwad@nvidia.com (Prashant Gaikwad) · 2012-12-23
[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit · Richard Zhao <hidden> · 2012-12-24
[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit · pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver) · 2013-01-02
[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit · pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver) · 2013-01-02
[PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpufreq: move clk_get/put out of function tegra_cpu_init/exit · Stephen Warren <hidden> · 2013-01-02

STALE4901d

From: pgaikwad@nvidia.com (Prashant Gaikwad)
Date: 2012-12-23 10:35:26
Also in: linux-tegra

On Saturday 22 December 2012 02:57 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:

On 12/21/2012 03:09 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:

quoted

tegra_cpu_init/exit will be called every time one cpu core is online or
offline. And all cpu cores share same clocks, redundant clk_get/put
wast time,  so I move them out.

I think this is reasonable.

Prashant, Peter, any comments?

Is any other work in tegra_cpu_init() redundant? Is tegra_cpu_init()
supposed to be called due to hotplug, or is that a bug in the cpufreq core?

Looks good. Also, instead of array we can use single variable for 
target_cpu_speed.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help