[PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: psci: add support for PSCI invocations from the kernel
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-18 21:59:45
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:51:27PM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:quoted
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
+static int psci_cpu_suspend(struct psci_power_state state, + unsigned long entry_point) +{ + int err; + u32 fn, power_state; + + fn = psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND]; + power_state = psci_power_state_pack(state); + err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, power_state, (u32)entry_point, 0);Why do you need the u32 cast here?That's a hangover from when entry_point was a void *. I'll fix that, thanks.
Hopefully you didn't pass virtual pointers to the PSCI call, did you? :-)
quoted
quoted
+static int __init psci_init(void) +{ + struct device_node *np; + const char *method; + u32 base, id; + + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match); + if (!np) + return 0; + + pr_info("probing function IDs from device-tree\n");Having "probing function IDs from device-tree" in the middle of a kernel log isn't very informative. Better make this more useful or remove it.quoted
+ + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "function-base", &base)) { + pr_warning("missing \"function-base\" property\n");Same thing here: this lacks context in a kernel log. And so on for the other occurrences.Actually, these are all prefixed with "psci: " thanks to the pr_fmt definition at the top of the file.
Ah, goodie! No more issue then. Nicolas