[PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: psci: add support for PSCI invocations from the kernel

On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Will Deacon wrote:

This patch adds support for the Power State Coordination Interface
defined by ARM, allowing Linux to request CPU-centric power-management
operations from firmware implementing the PSCI protocol.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <redacted>

[...]

+/*
+ * The following two functions are invoked via the invoke_psci_fn pointer
+ * and will not be inlined, allowing us to piggyback on the AAPCS.
+ */

To make sure the code is always in sync with the intent, you could mark 
those with  noinline as well.

+static int __invoke_psci_fn_hvc(u32 function_id, u32 arg0, u32 arg1, u32 arg2)
+{
+	asm volatile(
+			__asmeq("%0", "r0")
+			__asmeq("%1", "r1")
+			__asmeq("%2", "r2")
+			__asmeq("%3", "r3")
+			__HVC(0)
+		: "+r" (function_id)
+		: "r" (arg0), "r" (arg1), "r" (arg2));
+
+	return function_id;
+}
+
+static int __invoke_psci_fn_smc(u32 function_id, u32 arg0, u32 arg1, u32 arg2)
+{
+	asm volatile(
+			__asmeq("%0", "r0")
+			__asmeq("%1", "r1")
+			__asmeq("%2", "r2")
+			__asmeq("%3", "r3")
+			__SMC(0)
+		: "+r" (function_id)
+		: "r" (arg0), "r" (arg1), "r" (arg2));
+
+	return function_id;
+}
+
+static int psci_cpu_suspend(struct psci_power_state state,
+			    unsigned long entry_point)
+{
+	int err;
+	u32 fn, power_state;
+
+	fn = psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND];
+	power_state = psci_power_state_pack(state);
+	err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, power_state, (u32)entry_point, 0);

Why do you need the u32 cast here?

+	return psci_to_linux_errno(err);
+}
+
+static int psci_cpu_off(struct psci_power_state state)
+{
+	int err;
+	u32 fn, power_state;
+
+	fn = psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF];
+	power_state = psci_power_state_pack(state);
+	err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, power_state, 0, 0);
+	return psci_to_linux_errno(err);
+}
+
+static int psci_cpu_on(unsigned long cpuid, unsigned long entry_point)
+{
+	int err;
+	u32 fn;
+
+	fn = psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_ON];
+	err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, cpuid, entry_point, 0);
+	return psci_to_linux_errno(err);
+}
+
+static int psci_migrate(unsigned long cpuid)
+{
+	int err;
+	u32 fn;
+
+	fn = psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE];
+	err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, cpuid, 0, 0);
+	return psci_to_linux_errno(err);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
+	{ .compatible = "arm,psci",	},
+	{},
+};
+
+static int __init psci_init(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+	const char *method;
+	u32 base, id;
+
+	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match);
+	if (!np)
+		return 0;
+
+	pr_info("probing function IDs from device-tree\n");

Having "probing function IDs from device-tree" in the middle of a kernel 
log isn't very informative.  Better make this more useful or remove it.

+
+	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "function-base", &base)) {
+		pr_warning("missing \"function-base\" property\n");

Same thing here: this lacks context in a kernel log.
And so on for the other occurrences.


Nicolas