On 28 November 2012 15:00, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

On 21 November 2012 16:22, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 16 October 2012 13:44, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 16 October 2012 10:17, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This code has not been tested on a "legacy" ARM PL180 but only for
ux500 boards. Even if it should affect DMA handling we should test
this properly. Would be great if you were able to help out, I guess
you still have available hardware for these tests?

I can test the Integrator/CP and Realview in IRQ/PIO mode and
the U300 in DMA mode.

Great!

quoted

I need some help to provoke errorpath in DMA mode though,
so any hints are welcome...

One good option could be to stress test card insert/removal sequences,
while at the same time doing read/write requests.

quoted

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

Just a kind reminder for Linus; did you manage to do some tests for
these patches?

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

I have now tested these patches for ARM-RealView PB1176. Looks good! I
stress tested card insert/remove at the same time you write/read to
the card. Error handling is stable.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

For clarification. Skip this patch.

The next version is rebased on top of 3.7 and is thus not based on
"mmc: mmci: Support non-power-of-two block sizes for ux500v2 variant",
which needs some rework.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson