Hi Loic/Ohad,

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Loic PALLARDY [off-list ref] wrote:

On 12/21/2012 08:31 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Olof Johansson[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

While we can make the branch stable, would it make sense to make
remoteproc for omap depend on !multiplatform during the transition, to
reduce dependencies a little? Either way works, but it'd be nice to
keep them independent if we can.

I'm not sure multiplatform is the culprit; OMAP's remoteproc driver
heavily depends on this mailbox code, and obviously breaks with this
patch-set if only for the the naming changes. We'll need this patch
set to update omap's remoteproc as well so at least we don't break
bisectibility, though running a sanity test before merging would be
even nicer (Loic I can help if you don't have a panda board).

Hi Ohad,
Yes tidspbridge and remoteproc must be adapted.
This new mailbox fw has been tested on TI environment by Omar, who did
adaptation at least for tidspbridge.

Omar, do you have patch series ready for TI adaptations to new mailbox
framework?
Else I can do it, but I won't be able to test it (no panda board)

Yes, I made the changes, for tidspbridge and remoteproc, I will submit
both for review, based on this series.

Cheers,

Omar