Thread (65 messages) 65 messages, 8 authors, 2012-12-03
STALE4928d

[PATCH v4 07/14] KVM: ARM: Inject IRQs and FIQs from userspace

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-19 14:55:46
Also in: kvm

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:42:59PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
From: Christoffer Dall <redacted>

All interrupt injection is now based on the VM ioctl KVM_IRQ_LINE.  This
works semantically well for the GIC as we in fact raise/lower a line on
a machine component (the gic).  The IOCTL uses the follwing struct.

struct kvm_irq_level {
        union {
                __u32 irq;     /* GSI */
                __s32 status;  /* not used for KVM_IRQ_LEVEL */
        };
        __u32 level;           /* 0 or 1 */
};

ARM can signal an interrupt either at the CPU level, or at the in-kernel irqchip
(GIC), and for in-kernel irqchip can tell the GIC to use PPIs designated for
specific cpus.  The irq field is interpreted like this:

  bits:  | 31 ... 24 | 23  ... 16 | 15    ...    0 |
  field: | irq_type  | vcpu_index |   irq_number   |

The irq_type field has the following values:
- irq_type[0]: out-of-kernel GIC: irq_number 0 is IRQ, irq_number 1 is FIQ
- irq_type[1]: in-kernel GIC: SPI, irq_number between 32 and 1019 (incl.)
               (the vcpu_index field is ignored)
- irq_type[2]: in-kernel GIC: PPI, irq_number between 16 and 31 (incl.)

The irq_number thus corresponds to the irq ID in as in the GICv2 specs.

This is documented in Documentation/kvm/api.txt.

Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index 5ac3132..15e2ab1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/mman.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <trace/events/kvm.h>

 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
@@ -272,6 +273,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

 void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
 {
+       vcpu->cpu = cpu;
 }

 void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -312,6 +314,74 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
        return -EINVAL;
 }

+static int vcpu_interrupt_line(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int number, bool level)
+{
+       int bit_index;
+       bool set;
+       unsigned long *ptr;
+
+       if (number == KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_IRQ)
+               bit_index = __ffs(HCR_VI);
+       else /* KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_FIQ */
+               bit_index = __ffs(HCR_VF);
+
+       ptr = (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.irq_lines;
+       if (level)
+               set = test_and_set_bit(bit_index, ptr);
+       else
+               set = test_and_clear_bit(bit_index, ptr);
+
+       /*
+        * If we didn't change anything, no need to wake up or kick other CPUs
+        */
+       if (set == level)
+               return 0;
+
+       /*
+        * The vcpu irq_lines field was updated, wake up sleeping VCPUs and
+        * trigger a world-switch round on the running physical CPU to set the
+        * virtual IRQ/FIQ fields in the HCR appropriately.
+        */
+       kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level)
+{
+       u32 irq = irq_level->irq;
+       unsigned int irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num;
+       int nrcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
+       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
+       bool level = irq_level->level;
+
+       irq_type = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK;
+       vcpu_idx = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_VCPU_MASK;
+       irq_num = (irq >> KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_SHIFT) & KVM_ARM_IRQ_NUM_MASK;
+
+       trace_kvm_irq_line(irq_type, vcpu_idx, irq_num, irq_level->level);
+
+       if (irq_type == KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_CPU ||
+           irq_type == KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_PPI) {
+               if (vcpu_idx >= nrcpus)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+
+               vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_idx);
+               if (!vcpu)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       switch (irq_type) {
+       case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_CPU:
+               if (irq_num > KVM_ARM_IRQ_CPU_FIQ)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+
+               return vcpu_interrupt_line(vcpu, irq_num, level);
+       }
+
+       return -EINVAL;
+}
Holy cyclomatic complexity Batman! Any way this can be cleaned up?

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help