Thread (65 messages) 65 messages, 8 authors, 2012-12-03
STALE4934d

[PATCH v4 02/14] ARM: Section based HYP idmap

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-19 14:16:31
Also in: kvm

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:42:24PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add a method (hyp_idmap_setup) to populate a hyp pgd with an
identity mapping of the code contained in the .hyp.idmap.text
section.

Offer a method to drop this identity mapping through
hyp_idmap_teardown.

Make all the above depend on CONFIG_ARM_VIRT_EXT and CONFIG_ARM_LPAE.

Cc: Will Deacon <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/idmap.h                |    5 ++
 arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-hwdef.h |    1 
 arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S               |    6 ++
 arch/arm/mm/idmap.c                         |   74 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/idmap.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/idmap.h
index bf863ed..36708ba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/idmap.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/idmap.h
@@ -11,4 +11,9 @@ extern pgd_t *idmap_pgd;
 
 void setup_mm_for_reboot(void);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_VIRT_EXT
+void hyp_idmap_teardown(pgd_t *hyp_pgd);
+void hyp_idmap_setup(pgd_t *hyp_pgd);
+#endif
I wonder whether the dependency is quite right here. Functionally, we're
only dependent on LPAE but it doesn't make sense if !ARM_VIRT_EXT. In
fact, I start to question whether CONFIG_ARM_VIRT_EXT is worthwhile at
all as it stands. Maybe it would be better to add the LPAE dependency
there and make the hyp_stub stuff that's currently in mainline
unconditional?
+/*
+ * This version actually frees the underlying pmds for all pgds in range and
+ * clear the pgds themselves afterwards.
+ */
+void hyp_idmap_teardown(pgd_t *hyp_pgd)
+{
+	unsigned long addr, end;
+	unsigned long next;
+	pgd_t *pgd = hyp_pgd;
+
+	addr = virt_to_phys(__hyp_idmap_text_start);
+	end = virt_to_phys(__hyp_idmap_text_end);
+
+	pgd += pgd_index(addr);
+	do {
+		next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
+		if (!pgd_none_or_clear_bad(pgd))
+			hyp_idmap_del_pmd(pgd, addr);
+	} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr < end);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hyp_idmap_teardown);
+
+void hyp_idmap_setup(pgd_t *hyp_pgd)
+{
+	identity_mapping_add(hyp_pgd, __hyp_idmap_text_start,
+			     __hyp_idmap_text_end, PMD_SECT_AP1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hyp_idmap_setup);
+#endif
Again, do we need these exports?

I also think it might be cleaner to declare the hyp_pgd next to the
idmap_pgd then add the hyp_idmap_setup code to init_static_idmap, so
that we don't add new entry points to this file. The teardown can all be
moved into the kvm/ code as it doesn't need any of the existing idmap
functions.

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help