(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH 14/26] ARM: OMAP3: clock: Add 3xxx data using common struct clk · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-08
[PATCH 14/26] ARM: OMAP3: clock: Add 3xxx data using common struct clk · Mike Turquette <hidden> · 2012-11-08
[PATCH 14/26] ARM: OMAP3: clock: Add 3xxx data using common struct clk · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-08
[PATCH 14/26] ARM: OMAP3: clock: Add 3xxx data using common struct clk · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09
[PATCH 14/26] ARM: OMAP3: clock: Add 3xxx data using common struct clk · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09
[PATCH 14/26] ARM: OMAP3: clock: Add 3xxx data using common struct clk · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09
[PATCH 14/26] ARM: OMAP3: clock: Add 3xxx data using common struct clk · Mike Turquette <hidden> · 2012-11-09
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · Mike Turquette <hidden> · 2012-11-08
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · Mike Turquette <hidden> · 2012-11-09
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · Mike Turquette <hidden> · 2012-11-09
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks · paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) · 2012-11-09

STALE5018d

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: clockdomain: disabling unused clks

From: paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley)
Date: 2012-11-09 19:52:21
Also in: linux-omap

On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Mike Turquette wrote:

But I'm OK with the below patch in the short term.  I just have one
question: did you observe any PM regressions by skipping the clkdm
programming?

It's still under test here but 3530ES3 Beagle passed the PM tests with it, 
with no obvious warnings.

- Paul