[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code
From: Fabio Baltieri <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-23 13:00:31
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
Hello Viresh, On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 01:42:06AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
+static inline int delay_for_sampling_rate(unsigned int sampling_rate)
+{
+ int delay = usecs_to_jiffies(sampling_rate);
+
+ /* We want all CPUs to do sampling nearly on same jiffy */
+ if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
+ delay -= jiffies % delay;
+
+ return delay;
+}[...]
+static void od_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info =
+ container_of(work, struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s, cdbs.work.work);
+ unsigned int cpu = dbs_info->cdbs.cpu;
+ int delay, sample_type = dbs_info->sample_type;
+
+ mutex_lock(&dbs_info->cdbs.timer_mutex);
-/* cpufreq_ondemand Governor Tunables */
-#define show_one(file_name, object) \
-static ssize_t show_##file_name \
-(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf) \
-{ \
- return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dbs_tuners_ins.object); \
+ /* Common NORMAL_SAMPLE setup */
+ dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
+ if (sample_type == OD_SUB_SAMPLE) {
+ delay = dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies;
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(dbs_info->cdbs.cur_policy,
+ dbs_info->freq_lo, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ } else {
+ dbs_check_cpu(&od_dbs_data, cpu);
+ if (dbs_info->freq_lo) {
+ /* Setup timer for SUB_SAMPLE */
+ dbs_info->sample_type = OD_SUB_SAMPLE;
+ delay = dbs_info->freq_hi_jiffies;
+ } else {
+ delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(dbs_info->rate_mult);^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I think this one should be: delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners.sampling_rate * dbs_info->rate_mult); as currently the timer is firing every jiffy. This was the old code:
-static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
[...]
- delay = usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate - * dbs_info->rate_mult); - - if (num_online_cpus() > 1) - delay -= jiffies % delay;
I'm sending a patch for this one. Fabio -- Fabio Baltieri