On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 21:43:46 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 11:37:13 Viresh Kumar wrote:

quoted

On 22 October 2012 14:16, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 20 October 2012 01:42, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Initially ondemand governor was written and then using its code conservative
governor is written. It used a lot of code from ondemand governor, but copy of
code was created instead of using the same routines from both governors. Which
increased code redundancy, which is difficult to manage.

This patch is an attempt to move common part of both the governors to
cpufreq_governor.c file to come over above mentioned issues.

This shouldn't change anything from functionality point of view.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

For everybody else, this patch is already pushed by Rafael in his linux-next
branch.

Well, not yet, although I'm going to do that.

Or I would if it still applied.  Unfortunately, though, it doesn't apply any
more to my linux-next branch due to some previous changes in it.

Care to rebase?

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.