[PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwright at ni.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 2:36 PM
To: Michal Simek
Cc: arm at kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org; John Linn; Nick Bowler; Arnd Bergmann
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:24:16AM +0000, Michal Simek wrote:

quoted

Hi Josh,

quoted

Michal-

Here is a v5 of the zynq cleanup patchset that addresses your
feedback.  I've intentionally left patches 4 and 5 in the set until
we figure out the appropriate way to get them in tree (feel free to
just apply 1-3)

I am ok to pick just several patches from your patchset. But this is
no definitely good working style. Not expert for submission process
but I think that if there is one broken patch maintainer shouldn't
apply it.  Can someone else check this?

It turns out that with the change to patch 5 to map the uart to a known working
address (instead of VMALLOC_END - 0x1000), patch 4 isn't needed, and as such
can be dropped.  (I didn't realize this until this morning until I had saw you had
applied 1-3,5 to your tree, but not 4).

So, for what it's worth, you've applied all of the relevant patches for this
patchset.

Ok. Great.

Thanks,
MIchal