On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:24:16AM +0000, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Josh,
quoted
Michal-
Here is a v5 of the zynq cleanup patchset that addresses your
feedback. I've intentionally left patches 4 and 5 in the set until
we figure out the appropriate way to get them in tree (feel free to
just apply 1-3)
I am ok to pick just several patches from your patchset. But this is
no definitely good working style. Not expert for submission process
but I think that if there is one broken patch maintainer shouldn't
apply it. Can someone else check this?
It turns out that with the change to patch 5 to map the uart to a known
working address (instead of VMALLOC_END - 0x1000), patch 4 isn't needed,
and as such can be dropped. (I didn't realize this until this morning
until I had saw you had applied 1-3,5 to your tree, but not 4).
So, for what it's worth, you've applied all of the relevant patches for
this patchset.
Josh