On Tuesday 23 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:50:11PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Monday 22 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h
index d0d3f8f..ae3b236 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h
-#define TTC0_PHYS 0xF8001000
-#define TTC0_VIRT TTC0_PHYS
+#define TTC0_PHYS 0xF8001000
+#define TTC0_SIZE SZ_4K
+#define TTC0_VIRT (UART0_VIRT - TTC0_SIZE)
It's quite likely that this does not have to be a fixed mapping
any more. Just have a look at how drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c
calls of_iomap() to get the address.
Yes, this is already on my list of plans. The in-tree TTC driver
unfortunately doesn't yet support device tree bindings. Are you
comfortable waiting on the DT-ification of the TTC in a follow-up
patchset?
Yes, that's fine. If you do that, you can also move the driver to
drivers/clocksource in another patch.
Arnd