[GIT PULL V2 1/4] ARM: Kirkwood: DT bindings for v3.7

On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Jason Cooper wrote:

Ok, I'm still mastering the art of branch dependencies.  The acceptance
of Gregory's cache-l2x0 series is holding up everything else.
Rightfully so, rmk has some issues with it.

However, in my pullrqs and in my branch merging I treated it as a
dependency for everything that came after it (pr 1,2,3,4).  I'd like to
undo that now to get things moving.  The dependency was not strictly
necessary, I was simply trying to achieve an ordering of branches.

The only way I know to do this is to redo my branches and republish.
Basically, I would remove Gregory's patches and the dependency on 'arm:
cache-l2x0' from pullrq [1/4] Kirkwood DT bindings.

Right, makes sense.

Obviously, this would break things for folks tracking my branches.
Hopefully anyone crazy enough to track my branches is competent enough
rebase onto the new branches.  Even still, I don't want to mess anyone up.

I think the benefits of getting these patches in for this merge window
outweigh a onetime breaking of my branches.  Is there anything I'm not
considering before I do this?

I'll do the work now, but hold off on pushing or sending new pullrq's
for a day or two or until I hear from you guys.

My rule is normally that I treat any branches coming from subarchitecture
maintainers as unstable until they are merged into arm-soc.
If you haven't promised anyone to keep your branches stable, I see no
problem with rebasing them to avoid the dependency.

	Arnd