[GIT PULL] Kirkwood: board changes for v3.7
From: Jason Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-05 23:44:29
Olof, Thanks for the help! On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:34:35PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:11:29PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:quoted
The following changes since commit 0d7614f09c1ebdbaa1599a5aba7593f147bf96ee: Linux 3.6-rc1 (2012-08-02 16:38:10 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.infradead.org/users/jcooper/linux.git boards-for-v3.7-v2Hmm, this branch contains one duplicate patch due to me applying one straight to our fixes branch ("ARM: Kirkwood: Fix 'SZ_1M' undeclared here for db88f6281-bp-setup.c"). I also didn't see that mentioned in the pull request below, so I'm guessing you added it afterwards. There are also a couple of merge conflicts with other fixes we have already pulled in from you, it'd be nice if you just based this branch on those fixes instead. Also, I wonder if I could have you split up this branch a bit more? My suggestions are below. You can have branches build on top of each other where there are dependencies, just please point them out when you send the pull requests. Let me know if I'm unclear or if there's something that doesn't make sense, I'll be happy to help.
No problem, but I do have one question. Say I have two branches, fixes dt And then a 'board' patch depends on stuff in both fixes and dt. If I base the board branch on fixes, do I 'git merge' the dt branch, 'git cherry-pick' the dependency (what I did before), or something else I'm not aware of? I've avoided 'git merge' up till now because it creates a merge commit, which feels wrong. Perhaps I'm wrong here? All the branch assignments look good, assuming I can figure out the above question.
quoted
...
quoted
arm: plat-orion: use 'void __iomem *' in addr-map codeHmm, I would prefer if the actual constants were annotated instead of cast in the code here. See how we handled that on tegra with IOMEM(). That will also help sparse catch unannotated uses of those constants.
I'll ask Thomas if he can redo this one. thx, Jason.